September 19, 2023

Role of Early Childhood Education Leader in Contemporary Australia

Early childhood education in Australia is significant to everyone in Australia, especially for the overall development of children. The curriculum is designed for holistic development of a child, and equip them with skills and knowledge, thus preparing them for lifelong learning.

Central to all that is the educational leader, a formal teacher/educator who has assumed a leadership role both in the classroom and in the center. This report will present a brief role of such educational leadership, challenges that they face and the contributions in context the Australian context. An example of a best practice has been presented which is relevant to the Australian context, and its effectiveness in the Australian landscape. The term ‘education  leader’ and ‘educational leader’ has been used interchangeably in the context of this report.

RESPONSIBILITIES OF EARLY CHILDHOOD EDUCATION LEADERS

A document in Queensland government’s education website credit that first early childhood education started on 10 August 1891, when around 40 female teachers from Brisbane and the following suburbs undertook the first ever training for early childhood teachers in Queensland, a first-ever in Australia. KU Children's Services credit it to 1895 when the first Kindergarten Union of NSW was established, and “in that moment, early education in Australia was born” (KU Children's Services, 2021). However humble the beginning, the present role and influence of educational leaders are exceptionally significant and important, more so evolving from a passive perspective to an active changemaker, both inside the classroom and at the center (Sims et al., 2017).

Their responsibilities transcend pedagogy and administrative, moving over to community engagement. Providing curriculum direction to educators, and engaging them with all approved learning frameworks, including principles, practices and learning outcomes according to ACECQA (2012a).

ACECQA’s publication of a 2018 National Quality Standard (NQS) Quality Area 7: The role of the educational leader handbook, defines the role of educational leader as primarily to collaborate with educators and provide support regarding curriculum direction. There is also mention of leading the development of educational programs and ensuring children’s learning is guided by the approved learning outcomes frameworks (ACECQA, 2018a) (ACECQA, 2018b)

Case in point, a curriculum leader in an Early Childhood Education (ECE) center will be responsible for the monitoring pedagogical documentation such as written observation, program plans and evaluations developed for each child (Sims et al., 2017) (Fleet et al., 2015).

CHALLENGES FACED BY EARLY CHILDHOOD EDUCATION LEADERS

There are numerous challenges that ECE education leaders face in Australia, starting from regulatory complexity to policy changes and limited resources. A research by Brooker and Cumming (2019) highlights the dark side of education leadership, where educators are handicapped because the centre is trying to save money. Resources are limited, the teacher-to-children ration are barely maintained, while safety practices are ignored, unpaid meetings conducted and underpaid staff whose qualifications are not recognized according to research (Brooker and Cumming, 2019).

Early childhood services are a growing industry with a huge potential for revenue generation. Profit will be at the centre of managements mind as they are pressurised by the shareholders to turn over higher returns. This in turn leads to resource constraints for the general children and unavailability of proper individualised care packages to children of diverse needs according to Brooker and Cumming (2019). This poses a challenge to the education leaders whose sole role is being contradicted, and he/she will turn to being thrifty for the sale of educating the children.

Teacher to children ratio is barely maintained and transferring of children from one room to another to ‘adjust’ the ratio for the day is a common trend in some centres according to Brooker and Cumming (2019). This undermines the integrity of the room educators.

These challenges negatively affect the morale of the early childhood educators and teachers in the classroom, as they become a part of the guilty group. There have been some instances when issues have been communicated, both formally and informally, to the management, which have been met with them being ‘black-listed’ within the organization according to a research by Brooker and Cumming (2019).

Addressing to diverse children’s need is another serious concern in almost all ECEs. Children with physical limitations as well as cultural and religious differences are all brought together under a homogeneous setting, and attending to their individual needs might run up operational costs of centre and the company, according to Brooker and Cumming (2019).

To overcome most of the obstacles and limitations that are associated with the families and the management, communication is the key. This can happen through electronic means, handbooks, formal and informal meetings, and discussions, and gathering feedback from all stakeholders. This will build partnerships with colleagues, families, schools, community workers and allied health professionals to promote the best learning opportunities for all children, as elaborated by Barnes (2022) as a role of educational leaders.

Communication with the management to balance the needs of the curriculum and the rooms with the mandates of the centre (and shareholders) is of utmost importance. This is in line with education leaders modelling professional and ethical practices.

CONTRIBUTIONS OF EARLY CHILDHOOD EDUCATION LEADERS

Educational leaders can not only model themselves on being professional and execute ethical practices, but they can also mentor other teachers, commit to ongoing professional development, and be advocates to the children, family, and community, besides building partnership with them, as listed by Barnes (2022).

They can exhibit professional practices and model ethical form using the ECA Code of Ethics as a model. Education leaders can contribute using their knowledge of current research and practices, frameworks, laws, and policies to make informed decisions and assist in the decision making of the management (Barnes, 2022). By being critical and knowledgeable of their role in the centre, they can justify their positions with clear intentions.

In case of pedagogical decisions and design, documenting plans, and evaluations, education leaders can contribute by being clear and precise of what is expected in the learning teaching intentions (Barnes, 2022). This leads to a shared understanding across the board with all educators being mentally prepared to portray to their best understanding and ability.

Education leaders also act as advocates, as bridges between the centre and the families. They can contribute by advocating for children to ensure that all their learning needs are fulfilled. They can advocate for better quality and change in the early childcare setting (Barnes, 2022).

According to Martin et al., he summarizes his findings in a research conducted in 2020, using twenty educational leaders and their perspectives. Rachel, one of the participants communicated that she is committed to quality (educational) programs …but found out that “Educational Leaders are motivated by professionalisation, while policy makers are motivated by accountability regimes” (Martin et al., 2020). This clearly outlines the difference in the mandates of these parties as recognized and experienced by themselves.

Therein lies the danger of the ripple effect that leadership plays in stakeholders, including children, teachers, and parents.

CONTEXT OF THE AUSTRALIAN EARLY CHILDHOOD EDUCATION SYSTEM

The Australian early childhood education system stresses on the importance of facilitating holistic child development, with "Belonging, Being & Becoming: The Early Years Learning Framework for Australia" as a key document (Australian Government Department of Education, 2022b). Children from birth till they attend primary schools, are catered to, with their “social, physical, emotional, personal, creative, and cognitive learning” delivered through a “formalised learning framework”, the National Quality Framework (NQF) according to the Department of Education website (Australian Government Department of Education, 2022a). The Australian Children’s Education and Care Quality Authority (ACECQA), an independent national authority is responsible for administering the NQF.

There are a diverse range of educational settings for early childhood education and care provided in Australia, like centre-based daycare, family daycare, outside school hours care, and in-home care (Australian Government Department of Education, 2022a).

The educators in these settings include those with a Cert III-IV, including Bachelor and Diploma in early childhood education. While the former stays on as an educator, the latter move up to leadership positions in the classroom and in the centre, as room leaders and curriculum leaders (Victorian Government, 2022).

ACECQA also looks after the accreditation and issuance of teaching license in Australia with strict requirements, both from the training and the accreditation bodies (ACECQA, 2012b).

Keeping the above contexts of Australia in mind, we can conclude that the role of an educational leadership is not taken for granted, and various policies, frameworks, and laws govern the early childhood setting in Australia.

BEST PRACTICES FOR EFFECTIVE LEADERSHIP

The foremost best practice that can have quite an impact is for the education leader to adopt a revolutionary leadership style, the hybrid leadership framework.

According to Bøe and Hognestad (2015), hybrid leadership framework is used in Norway where "formal teacher leaders in middle management level direct and facilitate staff resources for distributed pedagogical leadership". This is one example of best practice that can be implemented in Australia, where hybrid leaders can use hybrid forms of interaction and response to contextual factors, where power and democracy are intermingled.

Research indicates that instead of leading solely or operating collaboratively, a hybrid system works better (Bøe and Hognestad, 2015). Instead of leading from the front always, being amongst the educators and leading with the mass allows educational leaders to understand the ground reality. "When the leaders balance influence, trust, participation and support with enough control, authority and power" it supports their "capacity to direct and facilitate distributed leadership to preserve and safeguard their aims, methods and educational values" (Bøe and Hognestad, 2015).

Leadership for learning, as discussed in ACECQA’s occasional paper of 2017, mentions the NQS Quality 7 associating leadership with supporting professional learning and developing the educators under their supervision (ACECQA, 2017b). A research by Colmer found that “professional learning and development in education and care settings is determined by a range of external, internal, inter-personal and personal influences on educators” (ACECQA, 2017b). This is the ‘response to contextual factors’ as mentioned in the hybrid leadership framework, where response is based on the experience, context, and timeframe of the need.

CONCLUSION

In summary, the roles of an educational leader have been discussed within the scope of this report, with references taken from the NQS Quality Area 7. Though there are various challenges they might face, from various stakeholders, they can pave the way forward for change, because not only are they responsible for the curriculum matters but also for collaboration with the other educators working with them. Leadership is a tricky course to manoeuvre, and one well-researched method is hybrid mode, power and democracy can be mixed depending on the situation and context.

But this is not the end of the road. As Sims et al. (2017) asks whether the “leaders who have been in their role for a longer period move past automatic compliance into critique and challenge of the status quo? Or will sustained periods of compliance reinforce this as the behaviour that gets results: leadership that achieves and maintains a good quality accreditation?” (Sims et al., 2017).

To conclude, the necessity of cultivating strong leadership in the classroom and in early childhood centre will always be of paramount importance in Australia, and the world.

Image Courtesy: ACECQA website


REFERENCES

ACECQA. (2012a). Educational leadership. Www.acecqa.gov.au. https://www.acecqa.gov.au/resources/educational-leadership

ACECQA. (2012b). NQF approved qualifications list. Acecqa.gov.au. https://www.acecqa.gov.au/qualifications/nqf-approved

ACECQA. (2017a). Guide to the National Quality Standard. In acecqa.gov.au (pp. 1–352). https://www.acecqa.gov.au/sites/default/files/acecqa/files/National-Quality-Framework-Resources-Kit/NQF-Resource-03-Guide-to-NQS.pdf

ACECQA. (2017b). Leadership and management in education and care services. https://www.acecqa.gov.au/sites/default/files/2018-02/OccasionalPaper5-LeadershipManagementEducationCareServices.PDF

ACECQA. (2018a). Quality Area 7: Educational leadership and team building. https://www.acecqa.gov.au/sites/default/files/2018-04/QA7_EducationalLeadershipAndTeamBuilding_0.pdf

ACECQA. (2018b). Quality Area 7: The role of the educational leader. https://www.acecqa.gov.au/sites/default/files/2019-05/QA7_TheRoleOfTheEducationalLeader.pdf

Australian Government Department of Education. (2022a). About early childhood education and care in Australia. Department of Education. https://www.education.gov.au/early-childhood/about-early-childhood-education-and-care-australia

Australian Government Department of Education. (2022b). Belonging, Being & Becoming: The Early Years Learning Framework for Australia (V2.0). Australian Government Department of Education for the Ministerial Council. https://www.acecqa.gov.au/sites/default/files/2023-01/EYLF-2022-V2.0.pdf

Barnes, K. (2022, March 28). Educational leaders in New South Wales preschools: How are they leading the development and implementation of the educational program in their settings? Figshare.mq.edu.au. https://figshare.mq.edu.au/articles/thesis/Educational_leaders_in_New_South_Wales_preschools_how_are_they_leading_the_development_and_implementation_of_the_educational_program_in_their_settings_/19438889/1

Barnes, K., Hadley, F., & Cheeseman, S. (2019). Preschool educational leaders: Who are they and what are they doing? Australasian Journal of Early Childhood, 44(4), 351–364. https://doi.org/10.1177/1836939119870905

Bøe, M., & Hognestad, K. (2015). Directing and facilitating distributed pedagogical leadership: best practices in early childhood education. International Journal of Leadership in Education, 20(2), 133–148. https://doi.org/10.1080/13603124.2015.1059488

Brooker, M., & Cumming, T. (2019). The “dark side” of leadership in early childhood education. Australasian Journal of Early Childhood, 44(2), 183693911983207. https://doi.org/10.1177/1836939119832073

Fleet, A., Soper, R., Semann, A., & Madden, L. (2015). The role of the educational leader: Perceptions and expectations in a period of change. Australasian Journal of Early Childhood, 40(3), 29–37. https://doi.org/10.1177/183693911504000305

KU Children's Services. (2021). KU: Australia’s first early education provider since 1895. KU Children’s Services. https://www.ku.com.au/childcare/about-us/since-1895

Martin, J., Nuttall, J., Henderson, L., & Wood, E. (2020). Educational leaders and the project of professionalisation in early childhood education in Australia. International Journal of Educational Research, 101(101559), 1–15. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijer.2020.101559

Press, F., & Wong, S. (2013). A voice for young children: 75 years of early childhood Australia. https://researchoutput.csu.edu.au/ws/portalfiles/portal/10106375/75%26%2320%3BYears%26%2320%3Bpublication_proof06%26%2320%3B%281%29.pdf

Sims, M., Waniganayake, M., & Hadley, D. F. (2017). Educational leadership: An evolving role in Australian early childhood settings. Educational Management Administration & Leadership, 46(6), 960–979. https://doi.org/10.1177/1741143217714254

Siraj-Blatchford, I., & Manni, L. (2006). Effective leadership in the early years sector: The ELEYS study. Www.academia.edu. https://www.academia.edu/51252780/Effective_leadership_in_the_early_years_sector_The_ELEYS_study

Victorian Government. (2022). Types of careers in the early childhood sector. Vic.gov.au. https://www.vic.gov.au/types-careers-early-childhood-sector

No comments: